Let A = {0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5}. Let R be a relation on A defined by (x, y) \in R if and only if max{x, y} \in {3, 4}. Then among the statements (S1): The number of elements in R is 18, and (S2): The relation R is symmetric but neither reflexive nor...
Solutions · 1
Official solution
To evaluate the relation R on the set A={0,1,2,3,4,5}, we first need to understand the conditions for an element (x,y) to be in R. Specifically, (x,y)∈R if and only if max{x,y}∈{3,4}.
Considering this, let's list the pairs:
For max{x,y}=3, the possible pairs are:
(0,3),(3,0),(1,3),(3,1),(2,3),(3,2),(3,3)
For max{x,y}=4, the possible pairs are:
(0,4),(4,0),(1,4),(4,1),(2,4),(4,2),(3,4),(4,3),(4,4)
Combining these, the set R consists of the following elements:
R={(0,3),(3,0),(1,3),(3,1),(2,3),(3,2),(3,3),(0,4),(4,0),(1,4),(4,1),(2,4),(4,2),(3,4),(4,3),(4,4)}
This gives us a total of 16 elements in R, not 18 as initially claimed in statement S1.
Next, we analyze the properties of the relation R:
Reflexivity: A relation is reflexive if (x,x)∈R for all x∈A. For example, (0,0),(1,1),(2,2) are not in R, so R is not reflexive.
Symmetry: A relation is symmetric if whenever (a,b)∈R, then (b,a)∈R as well. For all pairs (x,y) listed, both (x,y) and (y,x) are present. Thus, R is symmetric.
Transitivity: A relation is transitive if whenever (a,b)∈R and (b,c)∈R, then (a,c)∈R. An example where transitivity fails is (0,3) and (3,1) are in R but (0,1) is not in R. Therefore, R is not transitive.
In conclusion, statement S2 is correct as R is symmetric but neither reflexive nor transitive.